Primary Recommendations
0
Total Mentions
52
Win Rate
0%
Implementation Rate
0%
How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool
out of 100
How often AI writes code after recommending
How often selected as primary choice
% of prompt constraints addressed
Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly
Consistency across assistants
Win Rate Trend
0% → 0%
Mention Volume
Weekly Activity
1 week of data
| Category | Recommended | Compared | Rejected | Total | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔀 Cross-Category | - | - | - | 2 | 0% |
| 📖 Developer Portal | - | 2 | - | 8 | 0% |
| 🚨 Incident Management | - | - | - | 8 | 0% |
| 📊 Observability | - | 4 | - | 18 | 0% |
| ⚡ Edge Compute | - | - | 1 | 1 | 0% |
| unknown | - | - | - | 7 | 0% |
| 🐛 Error Monitoring | - | 2 | - | 4 | 0% |
| 🔑 Secrets Management | - | - | - | 4 | 0% |
Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen
| Competitor | Wins Over You | Scenarios |
|---|---|---|
| incident.io | 4 | On-Call Rotation and Incident Lifecycle Setup |
| Sentry | 4 | Error Tracking for Next.js App Router, APM for Serverless Express on Vercel |
| OpsLevel | 2 | Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal |
| AWS Secrets Manager | 2 | SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation |
| New Relic | 1 | Full-Stack Observability for Express on ECS |
| Grafana | 1 | Managed OTel Backend Replacing Self-Hosted Jaeger |
| Cortex | 1 | Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal |
| Vercel Edge Functions | 1 | Edge Functions for Auth and Geo-Routing |
| Honeycomb | 1 | Managed OTel Backend Replacing Self-Hosted Jaeger |
| Statsig | 1 | ff-targeted-02 |
Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 52 benchmark responses
sentry beats you in 4 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing source maps, session replay, serverless compatible.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "serverless compatible" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "slack native workflow" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. incident-io addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "datadog sentry integration" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. incident-io addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "escalation policy" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. incident-io addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "status page" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. incident-io addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "budget 500mo" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. incident-io addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "migrate from backstage" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. opslevel addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "managed saas" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. opslevel addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "import existing catalog" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. opslevel addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "scorecards" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. opslevel addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "no dedicated platform team" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. opslevel addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
You're mentioned in 18 observability scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.
incident-io beats you in 4 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing escalation policy, status page.
You're mentioned in 4 error monitoring scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "otlp grpc export" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. grafana addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "pii scrubbing" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. grafana addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "free tier 5m spans" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. grafana addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "slo monitoring" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. grafana addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "vendor neutral" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. grafana addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "nextjs app router" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "source maps" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "session replay" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "slack pagerduty alerts" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "budget 30mo" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "auto instrumentation" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "small bundle size" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "sentry integration" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "soc2 type ii" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. aws-secrets-manager addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "automated rotation 90d" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. aws-secrets-manager addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "audit logging" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. aws-secrets-manager addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "fine grained acl" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. aws-secrets-manager addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "encryption at rest" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. aws-secrets-manager addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
You have zero presence in database, agent dev, ci cd. These categories have active benchmark prompts where competitors are being selected.
opslevel beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing import existing catalog, scorecards.