Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/Statsig

Statsig

statsig.com🚩 Feature Flags
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosTrade-offsRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

2

Total Mentions

17

Win Rate

12%

Implementation Rate

100%

codex_cli: 1cursor: 1

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

61
Grade: B

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)100/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)12/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)1/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)90/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

12% → 12%

Mention Volume

17(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🚩 Feature Flags121147%
unknown1--1100%
🔀 Cross-Category---20%

Constraint Scorecard

✓ Constraints Addressed

no client sdk1×

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

ab testing13×
server side evaluation8×
no flicker8×
fast evaluation 10ms8×
free tier8×
edge middleware8×
no client sdk5×
edge sub 10ms5×
segment amplitude integration5×
cost sensitive5×
soc2 ready2×
budget 200mo2×
solo founder2×
saml enterprise2×
low maintenance2×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
LaunchDarkly2Migrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side Evaluation
Doppler1Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)

Head-to-Head: Statsig vs LaunchDarkly

Statsig: 2 wins
LaunchDarkly: 2 wins
Ties: 10
Migrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side Evaluation
Migrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side Evaluation
Feature Flags with A/B Testing for Pricing Page
Migrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side Evaluation
Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)
Feature Flags with A/B Testing for Pricing Page
Migrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side Evaluation→ Statsig
Feature Flags with A/B Testing for Pricing Page
Feature Flags with A/B Testing for Pricing Page
Migrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side Evaluation→ LaunchDarkly
Feature Flags with A/B Testing for Pricing Page
Feature Flags with A/B Testing for Pricing Page
Migrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side Evaluation→ LaunchDarkly
ff-targeted-02→ Statsig

✓ Scenarios Won (2)

Migrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side Evaluation🚩 Feature Flags
ff-targeted-02

✗ Scenarios Lost (3)

Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)→ lost to Doppler
Migrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side Evaluation→ lost to LaunchDarkly
Migrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side Evaluation→ lost to LaunchDarkly

Trade-offs & Gotchas Cited

⚖ Trade-offs

we aim to solve problems that span the product development lifecycle

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 17 benchmark responses

P2

Address "no client sdk" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 12% to 33% when "no client sdk" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. launchdarkly addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 33% → 12% (delta: +-22%)
no client sdk
vs LaunchDarkly
P2

Address "edge sub 10ms" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 12% to 33% when "edge sub 10ms" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. launchdarkly addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 33% → 12% (delta: +-22%)
edge sub 10ms
vs LaunchDarkly
P2

Address "ab testing" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 12% to 33% when "ab testing" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. launchdarkly addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 33% → 12% (delta: +-22%)
ab testing
vs LaunchDarkly
P2

Address "segment amplitude integration" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 12% to 33% when "segment amplitude integration" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. launchdarkly addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 33% → 12% (delta: +-22%)
segment amplitude integration
vs LaunchDarkly
P2

Address "cost sensitive" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 12% to 33% when "cost sensitive" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. launchdarkly addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 33% → 12% (delta: +-22%)
cost sensitive
vs LaunchDarkly
Show 4 more recommendations
P3

Improve 7% win rate in feature flags

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 14 feature flags scenarios but only win 1. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Close gap with launchdarkly (2 losses)

MEDIUM

launchdarkly beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios.

Evidence
Migrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side EvaluationMigrate from LaunchDarkly to Server-Side Evaluation
vs LaunchDarkly
P3

Improve 0% win rate in cross-category

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 2 cross-category scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P4

Close gap with doppler (1 loss)

LOW

doppler beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario. Their advantage: addressing solo founder.

Evidence
Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)
solo founder
vs Doppler