Primary Recommendations
1
Total Mentions
14
Win Rate
7%
Implementation Rate
100%
How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool
out of 100
How often AI writes code after recommending
How often selected as primary choice
% of prompt constraints addressed
Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly
Consistency across assistants
Win Rate Trend
7% → 7%
Mention Volume
Weekly Activity
1 week of data
| Category | Recommended | Compared | Rejected | Total | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📊 Observability | 1 | 2 | - | 12 | 8% |
| unknown | - | - | - | 2 | 0% |
Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen
| Competitor | Wins Over You | Scenarios |
|---|---|---|
| Sentry | 2 | APM for Serverless Express on Vercel |
this meets your requirements
Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 14 benchmark responses
Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "serverless compatible" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
sentry beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing serverless compatible.
Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "auto instrumentation" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "small bundle size" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "sentry integration" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
You're mentioned in 12 observability scenarios but only win 1. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.