Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/OpsLevel

OpsLevel

opslevel.com📖 Developer Portal
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRationaleRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

2

Total Mentions

10

Win Rate

20%

Implementation Rate

100%

claude_code: 2

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

55
Grade: C

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)100/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)20/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)9/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)30/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

20% → 20%

Mention Volume

10(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
📖 Developer Portal21-1020%

Constraint Scorecard

✓ Constraints Addressed

import existing catalog2×
scorecards2×

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

github integration4×
pagerduty integration4×
incremental adoption4×
self serve4×
kubernetes ok4×
migrate from backstage4×
managed saas4×
import existing catalog4×
scorecards4×
no dedicated platform team4×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
Backstage1Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
Cortex1Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal
PagerDuty1Service Catalog for 50 Microservices

Head-to-Head: OpsLevel vs Backstage

OpsLevel: 2 wins
Backstage: 1 win
Ties: 7
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal→ OpsLevel
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal→ OpsLevel
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices→ Backstage
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal

✓ Scenarios Won (2)

Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal📖 Developer Portal
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal📖 Developer Portal

✗ Scenarios Lost (3)

Service Catalog for 50 Microservices→ lost to Backstage
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal→ lost to Cortex
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices→ lost to PagerDuty

Why AI Recommends This Vendor

### **Key Decision Factors**

### **Key Decision Factors**

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 10 benchmark responses

P2

Address "github integration" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 20% to 0% when "github integration" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. backstage addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 20% (delta: +20%)
github integration
vs Backstagevs PagerDuty
P2

Address "pagerduty integration" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 20% to 0% when "pagerduty integration" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. backstage addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 20% (delta: +20%)
pagerduty integration
vs Backstagevs PagerDuty
P2

Address "incremental adoption" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 20% to 0% when "incremental adoption" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. backstage addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 20% (delta: +20%)
incremental adoption
vs Backstagevs PagerDuty
P2

Address "self serve" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 20% to 0% when "self serve" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. backstage addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 20% (delta: +20%)
self serve
vs Backstagevs PagerDuty
P2

Address "kubernetes ok" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 20% to 0% when "kubernetes ok" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. backstage addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 20% (delta: +20%)
kubernetes ok
vs Backstagevs PagerDuty
Show 5 more recommendations
P3

Improve 20% win rate in developer portal

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 10 developer portal scenarios but only win 2. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Expand beyond claude_code

MEDIUM

Only recommended on claude_code (2×). codex_cli and cursor are not recommending you — improve discoverability through documentation, npm package naming, and example code.

P4

Close gap with backstage (1 loss)

LOW

backstage beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario. Their advantage: addressing github integration, pagerduty integration, incremental adoption.

Evidence
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
github integrationpagerduty integrationincremental adoption
vs Backstage
P4

Close gap with cortex (1 loss)

LOW

cortex beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario.

Evidence
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal
vs Cortex
P4

Close gap with pagerduty (1 loss)

LOW

pagerduty beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario. Their advantage: addressing github integration, pagerduty integration, incremental adoption.

Evidence
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
github integrationpagerduty integrationincremental adoption
vs PagerDuty