Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/incident.io

incident.io

incident.io🚨 Incident Management
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsScenariosRationaleRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

4

Total Mentions

8

Win Rate

50%

Implementation Rate

0%

claude_code: 2codex_cli: 2

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

44
Grade: C

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)0/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)50/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)29/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)90/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

50% → 50%

Mention Volume

8(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🚨 Incident Management4--850%

Constraint Scorecard

✓ Constraints Addressed

escalation policy4×
status page4×

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

keep pagerduty4×
slack native4×
jira action items4×
incident metrics4×
stakeholder dashboard4×

✓ Scenarios Won (4)

On-Call Rotation and Incident Lifecycle Setup🚨 Incident Management
On-Call Rotation and Incident Lifecycle Setup🚨 Incident Management
On-Call Rotation and Incident Lifecycle Setup🚨 Incident Management
On-Call Rotation and Incident Lifecycle Setup🚨 Incident Management

Why AI Recommends This Vendor

## 🏆 **Recommendation: Incident.io**

## 🏆 **Recommendation: Incident.io**

it wasn’t caught earlier) 6. What went well / what didn’t 7. Action items (owner, due date, priority) 8. Follow‑ups and verification plan

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 8 benchmark responses

P2

Fix implementation gap: recommended 4× but implemented 0×

HIGH

AI assistants recommend you but often don't write the setup code. This suggests SDK complexity or missing AI-friendly documentation. Implementation gaps concentrated on claude_code, codex_cli.

Evidence
On-Call Rotation and Incident Lifecycle SetupOn-Call Rotation and Incident Lifecycle SetupOn-Call Rotation and Incident Lifecycle SetupOn-Call Rotation and Incident Lifecycle Setup