Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/AWS Secrets Manager

AWS Secrets Manager

aws.amazon.com🔑 Secrets Management
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRationaleRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

2

Total Mentions

29

Win Rate

7%

Implementation Rate

100%

claude_code: 2

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

52
Grade: C

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)100/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)7/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)3/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)30/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

7% → 7%

Mention Volume

29(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🔑 Secrets Management22-1414%
🔀 Cross-Category---60%
unknown---30%
🔄 CI/CD---20%
🗄 Database---20%
📊 Observability---20%

Constraint Scorecard

✓ Constraints Addressed

audit logging2×
encryption at rest2×

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

managed hosted8×
env hierarchy8×
vercel preview integration8×
zero manual ci8×
2 week deadline4×
enterprise questionnaire4×
budget 100mo4×
ecs fargate4×
team of 44×
soc2 type ii4×
automated rotation 90d4×
audit logging4×
fine grained acl4×
encryption at rest4×
soc2 ready2×
budget 200mo2×
solo founder2×
saml enterprise2×
low maintenance2×
github actions only2×
monorepo2×
affected package detection2×
docker ecr2×
secure secrets2×
soc22×
eu data residency2×
staging prod separation2×
escape hatch2×
multi tenant rls2×
audit logs2×
managed platform2×
free tier2×
aws compatible2×
slack alerting2×
small team2×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
Doppler3Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production, SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
Sentry1Zero-to-Enterprise-Ready in 2 Weeks
Infisical1Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
Betterstack1Zero-to-Enterprise-Ready in 2 Weeks

Head-to-Head: AWS Secrets Manager vs Doppler

AWS Secrets Manager: 2 wins
Doppler: 3 wins
Ties: 14
Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production→ Doppler
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
B2B Backend-as-a-Service with RLS and Auth
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ Doppler
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ AWS Secrets Manager
B2B Backend-as-a-Service with RLS and Auth
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ AWS Secrets Manager
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ Doppler
sec-open-01

✓ Scenarios Won (2)

SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation🔑 Secrets Management
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation🔑 Secrets Management

✗ Scenarios Lost (6)

Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production→ lost to Doppler
Zero-to-Enterprise-Ready in 2 Weeks→ lost to Sentry
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production→ lost to Infisical
Zero-to-Enterprise-Ready in 2 Weeks→ lost to Betterstack
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to Doppler
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to Doppler

Why AI Recommends This Vendor

Not the Others?

Not the Others?

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 29 benchmark responses

P3

Close gap with doppler (3 losses)

MEDIUM

doppler beats you in 3 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing vercel preview integration.

Evidence
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/ProductionSOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated RotationSOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
vercel preview integration
vs Doppler
P3

Address "managed hosted" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "managed hosted" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 7% (delta: +7%)
managed hosted
vs Dopplervs Infisical
P3

Address "env hierarchy" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "env hierarchy" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 7% (delta: +7%)
env hierarchy
vs Dopplervs Infisical
P3

Address "vercel preview integration" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "vercel preview integration" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 7% (delta: +7%)
vercel preview integration
vs Dopplervs Infisical
P3

Address "zero manual ci" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "zero manual ci" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 7% (delta: +7%)
zero manual ci
vs Dopplervs Infisical
Show 11 more recommendations
P3

Address "2 week deadline" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "2 week deadline" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 7% (delta: +7%)
2 week deadline
vs Sentryvs Betterstack
P3

Address "enterprise questionnaire" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "enterprise questionnaire" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 7% (delta: +7%)
enterprise questionnaire
vs Sentryvs Betterstack
P3

Address "budget 100mo" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "budget 100mo" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 7% (delta: +7%)
budget 100mo
vs Sentryvs Betterstack
P3

Address "ecs fargate" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "ecs fargate" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 7% (delta: +7%)
ecs fargate
vs Sentryvs Betterstack
P3

Address "team of 4" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 7% to 0% when "team of 4" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 7% (delta: +7%)
team of 4
vs Sentryvs Betterstack
P3

Improve 0% win rate in database

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 2 database scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Improve 0% win rate in ci cd

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 2 ci cd scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Expand beyond claude_code

MEDIUM

Only recommended on claude_code (2×). codex_cli and cursor are not recommending you — improve discoverability through documentation, npm package naming, and example code.

P4

Expand into 3 new categories

LOW

You have zero presence in agent dev, edge compute, error monitoring. These categories have active benchmark prompts where competitors are being selected.

P5

Close gap with sentry (1 loss)

LOW

sentry beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario.

Evidence
Zero-to-Enterprise-Ready in 2 Weeks
vs Sentry
P5

Close gap with infisical (1 loss)

LOW

infisical beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario. Their advantage: addressing vercel preview integration, zero manual ci.

Evidence
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
vercel preview integrationzero manual ci
vs Infisical