Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/Honeycomb

Honeycomb

honeycomb.io📊 Observability
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

1

Total Mentions

25

Win Rate

4%

Implementation Rate

100%

codex_cli: 1

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

51
Grade: C

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)100/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)4/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)1/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)30/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

4% → 4%

Mention Volume

25(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
📊 Observability12-205%
⚡ Edge Compute--110%
🔀 Cross-Category-1-10%
unknown---30%

Constraint Scorecard

✓ Constraints Addressed

pii scrubbing1×

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

otlp grpc export7×
pii scrubbing7×
free tier 5m spans7×
slo monitoring7×
vendor neutral7×
serverless compatible6×
auto instrumentation6×
small bundle size6×
sentry integration6×
managed platform6×
free tier6×
aws compatible6×
slack alerting6×
small team6×
sub 10ms cold start1×
kv store1×
vercel integration1×
typescript1×
edge monitoring1×
soc2 ready1×
budget 200mo1×
solo founder1×
saml enterprise1×
low maintenance1×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
Sentry2APM for Serverless Express on Vercel
New Relic1Full-Stack Observability for Express on ECS
Grafana1Managed OTel Backend Replacing Self-Hosted Jaeger
Vercel Edge Functions1Edge Functions for Auth and Geo-Routing
Doppler1Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)

Head-to-Head: Honeycomb vs Sentry

Honeycomb: 0 wins
Sentry: 2 wins
Ties: 5
APM for Serverless Express on Vercel
APM for Serverless Express on Vercel
Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)
APM for Serverless Express on Vercel→ Sentry
APM for Serverless Express on Vercel
APM for Serverless Express on Vercel
APM for Serverless Express on Vercel→ Sentry

✓ Scenarios Won (1)

Managed OTel Backend Replacing Self-Hosted Jaeger📊 Observability

✗ Scenarios Lost (6)

Full-Stack Observability for Express on ECS→ lost to New Relic
Managed OTel Backend Replacing Self-Hosted Jaeger→ lost to Grafana
Edge Functions for Auth and Geo-Routing→ lost to Vercel Edge Functions
Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)→ lost to Doppler
APM for Serverless Express on Vercel→ lost to Sentry
APM for Serverless Express on Vercel→ lost to Sentry

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 25 benchmark responses

P1

Address "serverless compatible" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "serverless compatible" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
serverless compatible
vs Sentry
P1

Close gap with sentry (2 losses)

HIGH

sentry beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing serverless compatible.

Evidence
APM for Serverless Express on VercelAPM for Serverless Express on Vercel
serverless compatible
vs Sentry
P2

Address "auto instrumentation" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "auto instrumentation" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
auto instrumentation
vs Sentry
P2

Address "small bundle size" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "small bundle size" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
small bundle size
vs Sentry
P2

Address "sentry integration" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "sentry integration" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
sentry integration
vs Sentry
Show 3 more recommendations
P3

Improve 5% win rate in observability

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 20 observability scenarios but only win 1. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P4

Close gap with new-relic (1 loss)

LOW

new-relic beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario. Their advantage: addressing free tier.

Evidence
Full-Stack Observability for Express on ECS
free tier
vs New Relic
P4

Close gap with grafana (1 loss)

LOW

grafana beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario.

Evidence
Managed OTel Backend Replacing Self-Hosted Jaeger
vs Grafana