Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/Port

Port

getport.io📖 Developer Portal
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

0

Total Mentions

43

Win Rate

0%

Implementation Rate

0%

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

15
Grade: F

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)0/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)0/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)0/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)0/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

0% → 0%

Mention Volume

43(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🗄 Database---20%
🤖 Agentic Tooling---20%
📖 Developer Portal-1-120%
🔀 Cross-Category---10%
🔄 CI/CD-1-10%
📊 Observability---10%
unknown---220%
🔑 Secrets Management---20%

Constraint Scorecard

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

migrate from backstage6×
managed saas6×
import existing catalog6×
scorecards6×
no dedicated platform team6×
github integration6×
pagerduty integration6×
incremental adoption6×
self serve6×
kubernetes ok6×
serverless compatible2×
nodejs typescript2×
multi model2×
feedback loops2×
parallel execution2×
sub 20s pipeline2×
state inspection2×
soc2 type ii2×
automated rotation 90d2×
audit logging2×
fine grained acl2×
encryption at rest2×
edge compatible1×
no pii in cache1×
predictable cost1×
redis api compat1×
2 week deadline1×
enterprise questionnaire1×
budget 100mo1×
ecs fargate1×
team of 41×
pgvector required1×
eu data residency1×
pitr backups1×
local ci parity1×
containerized steps1×
multi arch1×
postgres integration tests1×
github actions runner1×
otlp grpc export1×
pii scrubbing1×
free tier 5m spans1×
slo monitoring1×
vendor neutral1×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
OpsLevel2Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal
Cloudflare Workers2edge-open-01
AWS Secrets Manager2SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
Backstage1Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
Cortex1Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal
Sentry1Zero-to-Enterprise-Ready in 2 Weeks
Neon1Serverless Postgres with Connection Pooling
Honeycomb1Managed OTel Backend Replacing Self-Hosted Jaeger
PagerDuty1Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
Statsig1ff-targeted-02

Head-to-Head: Port vs OpsLevel

Port: 0 wins
OpsLevel: 2 wins
Ties: 8
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal→ OpsLevel
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal→ OpsLevel
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal

✗ Scenarios Lost (13)

Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal→ lost to OpsLevel
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal→ lost to OpsLevel
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices→ lost to Backstage
Migrate from Backstage to Managed Portal→ lost to Cortex
Zero-to-Enterprise-Ready in 2 Weeks→ lost to Sentry
Serverless Postgres with Connection Pooling→ lost to Neon
Managed OTel Backend Replacing Self-Hosted Jaeger→ lost to Honeycomb
Service Catalog for 50 Microservices→ lost to PagerDuty
edge-open-01→ lost to Cloudflare Workers
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to AWS Secrets Manager
edge-open-01→ lost to Cloudflare Workers
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to AWS Secrets Manager
ff-targeted-02→ lost to Statsig

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 43 benchmark responses

P2

Address "migrate from backstage" to capture 3 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "migrate from backstage" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. opslevel addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
migrate from backstage
vs OpsLevelvs Cortex
P2

Address "managed saas" to capture 3 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "managed saas" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. opslevel addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
managed saas
vs OpsLevelvs Cortex
P2

Address "import existing catalog" to capture 3 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "import existing catalog" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. opslevel addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
import existing catalog
vs OpsLevelvs Cortex
P2

Address "scorecards" to capture 3 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "scorecards" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. opslevel addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
scorecards
vs OpsLevelvs Cortex
P2

Address "no dedicated platform team" to capture 3 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "no dedicated platform team" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. opslevel addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
no dedicated platform team
vs OpsLevelvs Cortex
Show 16 more recommendations
P2

Address "github integration" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "github integration" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. backstage addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
github integration
vs Backstagevs PagerDuty
P2

Address "pagerduty integration" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "pagerduty integration" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. backstage addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
pagerduty integration
vs Backstagevs PagerDuty
P2

Address "incremental adoption" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "incremental adoption" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. backstage addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
incremental adoption
vs Backstagevs PagerDuty
P2

Address "self serve" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "self serve" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. backstage addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
self serve
vs Backstagevs PagerDuty
P2

Address "kubernetes ok" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "kubernetes ok" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. backstage addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
kubernetes ok
vs Backstagevs PagerDuty
P2

Address "soc2 type ii" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "soc2 type ii" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. aws-secrets-manager addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
soc2 type ii
vs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "automated rotation 90d" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "automated rotation 90d" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. aws-secrets-manager addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
automated rotation 90d
vs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "audit logging" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "audit logging" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. aws-secrets-manager addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
audit logging
vs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "fine grained acl" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "fine grained acl" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. aws-secrets-manager addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
fine grained acl
vs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "encryption at rest" to capture 2 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "encryption at rest" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. aws-secrets-manager addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
encryption at rest
vs AWS Secrets Manager
P3

Improve 0% win rate in database

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 2 database scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Improve 0% win rate in agent dev

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 2 agent dev scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P4

Expand into 3 new categories

LOW

You have zero presence in edge compute, error monitoring, feature flags. These categories have active benchmark prompts where competitors are being selected.

P4

Close gap with opslevel (2 losses)

LOW

opslevel beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing import existing catalog, scorecards.

Evidence
Migrate from Backstage to Managed PortalMigrate from Backstage to Managed Portal
import existing catalogscorecards
vs OpsLevel
P4

Close gap with cloudflare-workers (2 losses)

LOW

cloudflare-workers beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios.

Evidence
edge-open-01edge-open-01
vs Cloudflare Workers
P4

Close gap with aws-secrets-manager (2 losses)

LOW

aws-secrets-manager beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing audit logging, encryption at rest.

Evidence
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated RotationSOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
audit loggingencryption at rest
vs AWS Secrets Manager