Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/Neon

Neon

neon.tech🗄 Database
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRationaleRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

8

Total Mentions

31

Win Rate

26%

Implementation Rate

75%

codex_cli: 4claude_code: 4

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

60
Grade: B

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)75/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)26/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)18/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)90/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

26% → 26%

Mention Volume

31(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🗄 Database6312129%
unknown2--633%
🔀 Cross-Category-1-40%

Constraint Scorecard

✓ Constraints Addressed

serverless compatible4×
pgvector required4×
eu data residency4×
pitr backups4×
branch per pr2×
pitr1×
real postgres1×

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

staging prod separation10×
eu data residency8×
branch per pr5×
real postgres5×
pitr5×
soc25×
escape hatch5×
multi tenant rls5×
audit logs5×
soc2 ready4×
budget 200mo4×
solo founder4×
saml enterprise4×
low maintenance4×
serverless compatible3×
pgvector required3×
pitr backups3×
offline first2×
embedded sql2×
conflict resolution2×
encryption at rest2×
hipaa adjacent2×
edge compute2×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
Turso2Offline-First Embedded Database with Sync
Doppler1Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)

Head-to-Head: Neon vs Turso

Neon: 0 wins
Turso: 2 wins
Ties: 1
Offline-First Embedded Database with Sync→ Turso
Offline-First Embedded Database with Sync→ Turso
db-open-02

✓ Scenarios Won (8)

Serverless Postgres with Connection Pooling🗄 Database
Serverless Postgres with Connection Pooling🗄 Database
Serverless Postgres with Connection Pooling🗄 Database
Database Branching for Preview Environments🗄 Database
Serverless Postgres with Connection Pooling🗄 Database
Database Branching for Preview Environments🗄 Database
db-open-02
db-open-02

✗ Scenarios Lost (3)

Offline-First Embedded Database with Sync→ lost to Turso
Offline-First Embedded Database with Sync→ lost to Turso
Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)→ lost to Doppler

Why AI Recommends This Vendor

Neon wins:**

Neon wins:**

**Neon** - a serverless Postgres database that excels in all these areas:

**Neon** - a serverless Postgres database that excels in all these areas:

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 31 benchmark responses

P3

Improve 29% win rate in database

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 21 database scenarios but only win 6. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Improve 0% win rate in cross-category

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 4 cross-category scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Address "offline first" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 26% to 0% when "offline first" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. turso addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 26% (delta: +26%)
offline first
vs Turso
P3

Address "embedded sql" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 26% to 0% when "embedded sql" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. turso addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 26% (delta: +26%)
embedded sql
vs Turso
P3

Address "conflict resolution" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 26% to 0% when "conflict resolution" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. turso addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 26% (delta: +26%)
conflict resolution
vs Turso
Show 5 more recommendations
P3

Address "encryption at rest" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 26% to 0% when "encryption at rest" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. turso addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 26% (delta: +26%)
encryption at rest
vs Turso
P3

Address "hipaa adjacent" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 26% to 0% when "hipaa adjacent" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. turso addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 26% (delta: +26%)
hipaa adjacent
vs Turso
P3

Address "edge compute" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 26% to 0% when "edge compute" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. turso addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 26% (delta: +26%)
edge compute
vs Turso
P4

Close gap with turso (2 losses)

LOW

turso beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing conflict resolution, encryption at rest, edge compute.

Evidence
Offline-First Embedded Database with SyncOffline-First Embedded Database with Sync
conflict resolutionencryption at restedge compute
vs Turso
P5

Close gap with doppler (1 loss)

LOW

doppler beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario. Their advantage: addressing solo founder.

Evidence
Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)
solo founder
vs Doppler