Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/Infisical

Infisical

infisical.com🔑 Secrets Management
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

1

Total Mentions

23

Win Rate

4%

Implementation Rate

100%

codex_cli: 1

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

51
Grade: C

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)100/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)4/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)2/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)30/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

4% → 4%

Mention Volume

23(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🔑 Secrets Management14-225%
🔀 Cross-Category---10%

Constraint Scorecard

✓ Constraints Addressed

vercel preview integration1×
zero manual ci1×

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

no self hosted8×
github actions integration8×
railway vercel integration8×
access control8×
audit log8×
managed hosted7×
env hierarchy7×
vercel preview integration7×
zero manual ci7×
soc2 type ii6×
automated rotation 90d6×
audit logging6×
fine grained acl6×
encryption at rest6×
soc2 ready1×
budget 200mo1×
solo founder1×
saml enterprise1×
low maintenance1×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
Doppler6Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files, Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production, SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
HashiCorp Vault2Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files
AWS Secrets Manager2SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
GitHub Actions1Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files

Head-to-Head: Infisical vs Doppler

Infisical: 1 win
Doppler: 6 wins
Ties: 15
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ Doppler
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ Doppler
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production→ Doppler
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ Doppler
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production→ Infisical
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ Doppler
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ Doppler

✓ Scenarios Won (1)

Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production🔑 Secrets Management

✗ Scenarios Lost (11)

Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ lost to Doppler
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ lost to Doppler
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ lost to GitHub Actions
Zero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/Production→ lost to Doppler
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ lost to Doppler
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ lost to HashiCorp Vault
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to Doppler
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to AWS Secrets Manager
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ lost to HashiCorp Vault
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to AWS Secrets Manager
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to Doppler

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 23 benchmark responses

P1

Address "audit log" to capture 6 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "audit log" is required. This constraint appears in 6 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
audit log
vs Dopplervs HashiCorp Vaultvs GitHub Actions
P1

Close gap with doppler (6 losses)

HIGH

doppler beats you in 6 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing github actions integration, access control, audit log.

Evidence
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env FilesCentralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env FilesZero-Touch Secret Sync Across Dev/CI/ProductionCentralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env FilesSOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated RotationSOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
github actions integrationaccess controlaudit logaudit loggingencryption at rest
vs Doppler
P2

Address "no self hosted" to capture 6 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "no self hosted" is required. This constraint appears in 6 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
no self hosted
vs Dopplervs HashiCorp Vaultvs GitHub Actions
P2

Address "github actions integration" to capture 6 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "github actions integration" is required. This constraint appears in 6 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
github actions integration
vs Dopplervs HashiCorp Vaultvs GitHub Actions
P2

Address "railway vercel integration" to capture 6 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "railway vercel integration" is required. This constraint appears in 6 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
railway vercel integration
vs Dopplervs HashiCorp Vaultvs GitHub Actions
Show 9 more recommendations
P2

Address "access control" to capture 6 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "access control" is required. This constraint appears in 6 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
access control
vs Dopplervs HashiCorp Vaultvs GitHub Actions
P2

Address "soc2 type ii" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "soc2 type ii" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
soc2 type ii
vs Dopplervs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "automated rotation 90d" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "automated rotation 90d" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
automated rotation 90d
vs Dopplervs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "audit logging" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "audit logging" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
audit logging
vs Dopplervs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "fine grained acl" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "fine grained acl" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
fine grained acl
vs Dopplervs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "encryption at rest" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 4% to 0% when "encryption at rest" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 4% (delta: +4%)
encryption at rest
vs Dopplervs AWS Secrets Manager
P3

Improve 5% win rate in secrets management

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 22 secrets management scenarios but only win 1. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Close gap with hashicorp-vault (2 losses)

MEDIUM

hashicorp-vault beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing github actions integration, access control, audit log.

Evidence
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env FilesCentralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files
github actions integrationaccess controlaudit log
vs HashiCorp Vault
P4

Close gap with aws-secrets-manager (2 losses)

LOW

aws-secrets-manager beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing audit logging, encryption at rest.

Evidence
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated RotationSOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
audit loggingencryption at rest
vs AWS Secrets Manager