Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/HashiCorp Vault

HashiCorp Vault

vaultproject.io🔑 Secrets Management
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRationaleRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

2

Total Mentions

25

Win Rate

8%

Implementation Rate

100%

claude_code: 2

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

52
Grade: C

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)100/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)8/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)7/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)30/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

8% → 8%

Mention Volume

25(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🔑 Secrets Management2--1414%
🗄 Database---10%
🔀 Cross-Category---20%
🤖 Agentic Tooling---20%
unknown---60%

Constraint Scorecard

✓ Constraints Addressed

github actions integration2×
access control2×
audit log2×

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

no self hosted6×
github actions integration6×
railway vercel integration6×
access control6×
audit log6×
soc2 type ii6×
automated rotation 90d6×
audit logging6×
fine grained acl6×
encryption at rest6×
soc2 ready2×
budget 200mo2×
solo founder2×
saml enterprise2×
low maintenance2×
sub 100ms latency2×
on premise data2×
multi language2×
middleware pattern2×
pii redaction2×
branch per pr1×
real postgres1×
staging prod separation1×
pitr1×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
Doppler5Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files, SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
AWS Secrets Manager2SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
GitHub Actions1Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files

Head-to-Head: HashiCorp Vault vs Doppler

HashiCorp Vault: 2 wins
Doppler: 5 wins
Ties: 10
Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ Doppler
Full Backend Stack for B2B SaaS (Solo Founder)
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ Doppler
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ Doppler
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ HashiCorp Vault
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ Doppler
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ HashiCorp Vault
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ Doppler
sec-open-01

✓ Scenarios Won (2)

Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files🔑 Secrets Management
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files🔑 Secrets Management

✗ Scenarios Lost (8)

Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ lost to Doppler
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ lost to Doppler
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ lost to GitHub Actions
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files→ lost to Doppler
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to Doppler
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to AWS Secrets Manager
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to AWS Secrets Manager
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation→ lost to Doppler

Why AI Recommends This Vendor

Doppler Wins for Your Use Case

Doppler Wins for Your Use Case

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 25 benchmark responses

P1

Address "audit log" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 8% to 33% when "audit log" is required. This constraint appears in 6 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 33% → 8% (delta: +-25%)
audit log
vs Dopplervs GitHub Actions
P2

Address "no self hosted" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 8% to 33% when "no self hosted" is required. This constraint appears in 6 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 33% → 8% (delta: +-25%)
no self hosted
vs Dopplervs GitHub Actions
P2

Address "github actions integration" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 8% to 33% when "github actions integration" is required. This constraint appears in 6 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 33% → 8% (delta: +-25%)
github actions integration
vs Dopplervs GitHub Actions
P2

Address "railway vercel integration" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 8% to 33% when "railway vercel integration" is required. This constraint appears in 6 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 33% → 8% (delta: +-25%)
railway vercel integration
vs Dopplervs GitHub Actions
P2

Address "access control" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 8% to 33% when "access control" is required. This constraint appears in 6 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 33% → 8% (delta: +-25%)
access control
vs Dopplervs GitHub Actions
Show 11 more recommendations
P2

Address "soc2 type ii" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 8% to 0% when "soc2 type ii" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 8% (delta: +8%)
soc2 type ii
vs Dopplervs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "automated rotation 90d" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 8% to 0% when "automated rotation 90d" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 8% (delta: +8%)
automated rotation 90d
vs Dopplervs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "audit logging" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 8% to 0% when "audit logging" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 8% (delta: +8%)
audit logging
vs Dopplervs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "fine grained acl" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 8% to 0% when "fine grained acl" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 8% (delta: +8%)
fine grained acl
vs Dopplervs AWS Secrets Manager
P2

Address "encryption at rest" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 8% to 0% when "encryption at rest" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. doppler addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 8% (delta: +8%)
encryption at rest
vs Dopplervs AWS Secrets Manager
P3

Improve 14% win rate in secrets management

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 14 secrets management scenarios but only win 2. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Close gap with doppler (5 losses)

MEDIUM

doppler beats you in 5 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing audit logging, encryption at rest.

Evidence
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env FilesCentralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env FilesCentralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env FilesSOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated RotationSOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
audit loggingencryption at rest
vs Doppler
P3

Improve 0% win rate in agent dev

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 2 agent dev scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Expand beyond claude_code

MEDIUM

Only recommended on claude_code (2×). codex_cli and cursor are not recommending you — improve discoverability through documentation, npm package naming, and example code.

P4

Close gap with aws-secrets-manager (2 losses)

LOW

aws-secrets-manager beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing audit logging, encryption at rest.

Evidence
SOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated RotationSOC 2 Secrets Management with Automated Rotation
audit loggingencryption at rest
vs AWS Secrets Manager
P5

Close gap with github-actions (1 loss)

LOW

github-actions beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario.

Evidence
Centralized Secrets Replacing Scattered .env Files
vs GitHub Actions