Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/Helicone

Helicone

helicone.ai🔭 LLM Observability
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

0

Total Mentions

11

Win Rate

0%

Implementation Rate

0%

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

15
Grade: F

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)0/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)0/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)0/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)0/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

0% → 0%

Mention Volume

11(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🔭 LLM Observability--280%
unknown---30%

Constraint Scorecard

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

no langchain8×
pii redaction8×
quality evaluation4×
conversation threading4×
cost tracking4×
multi model4×
soc24×
user feedback loop4×
non engineer dashboard4×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
Braintrust3Enterprise LLM Observability (Multi-Model), LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot
Langfuse1LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot

Head-to-Head: Helicone vs Braintrust

Helicone: 0 wins
Braintrust: 3 wins
Ties: 8
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot
Enterprise LLM Observability (Multi-Model)
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot
Enterprise LLM Observability (Multi-Model)
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot
Enterprise LLM Observability (Multi-Model)→ Braintrust
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot→ Braintrust
Enterprise LLM Observability (Multi-Model)→ Braintrust
llm-targeted-02
llm-targeted-02
llm-targeted-02

✗ Scenarios Lost (4)

LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot→ lost to Langfuse
Enterprise LLM Observability (Multi-Model)→ lost to Braintrust
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot→ lost to Braintrust
Enterprise LLM Observability (Multi-Model)→ lost to Braintrust

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 11 benchmark responses

P2

Address "no langchain" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "no langchain" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. braintrust addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
no langchain
vs Braintrustvs Langfuse
P2

Address "pii redaction" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "pii redaction" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. braintrust addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
pii redaction
vs Braintrustvs Langfuse
P3

Improve 0% win rate in llm observability

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 8 llm observability scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Close gap with braintrust (3 losses)

MEDIUM

braintrust beats you in 3 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing soc2, pii redaction, no langchain.

Evidence
Enterprise LLM Observability (Multi-Model)LLM Observability for Customer Support BotEnterprise LLM Observability (Multi-Model)
soc2pii redactionno langchainquality evaluationconversation threadingcost tracking
vs Braintrust
P3

Address "quality evaluation" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "quality evaluation" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. langfuse addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
quality evaluation
vs Langfusevs Braintrust
Show 7 more recommendations
P3

Address "conversation threading" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "conversation threading" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. langfuse addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
conversation threading
vs Langfusevs Braintrust
P3

Address "cost tracking" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "cost tracking" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. langfuse addresses it 1× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
cost tracking
vs Langfusevs Braintrust
P3

Address "multi model" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "multi model" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. braintrust addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
multi model
vs Braintrust
P3

Address "soc2" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "soc2" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. braintrust addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
soc2
vs Braintrust
P3

Address "user feedback loop" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "user feedback loop" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. braintrust addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
user feedback loop
vs Braintrust
P3

Address "non engineer dashboard" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "non engineer dashboard" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. braintrust addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
non engineer dashboard
vs Braintrust
P5

Close gap with langfuse (1 loss)

LOW

langfuse beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario. Their advantage: addressing no langchain, pii redaction, quality evaluation.

Evidence
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot
no langchainpii redactionquality evaluationcost tracking
vs Langfuse