Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/Braintrust

Braintrust

braintrustdata.com🔭 LLM Observability
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRationaleRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

6

Total Mentions

19

Win Rate

32%

Implementation Rate

67%

claude_code: 2codex_cli: 4

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

55
Grade: C

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)67/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)32/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)18/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)67/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

32% → 32%

Mention Volume

19(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🔭 LLM Observability4--1040%
🤖 Agentic Tooling2--633%
unknown---30%

Constraint Scorecard

✓ Constraints Addressed

soc22×
pii redaction2×
prompt versioning1×
ci eval suite1×
no langchain1×
quality evaluation1×
conversation threading1×
cost tracking1×
user feedback loop1×

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

no langchain5×
pii redaction5×
quality evaluation3×
conversation threading3×
cost tracking3×
prompt versioning3×
multi model2×
soc22×
user feedback loop2×
non engineer dashboard2×
ci eval gate2×
different eval model2×
pii in test data2×
budget 5 per run2×
regression detection2×
python fastapi2×
ab testing2×
instant rollback2×
staging prod promotion2×
langchain native1×
retrieval quality metrics1×
ci eval suite1×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
LangSmith2Automated Agent Evaluation with CI Gate
Langfuse1LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot

Head-to-Head: Braintrust vs LangSmith

Braintrust: 4 wins
LangSmith: 2 wins
Ties: 4
Automated Agent Evaluation with CI Gate→ Braintrust
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot
Automated Agent Evaluation with CI Gate→ Braintrust
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot
RAG Pipeline Debugging and Evaluation→ Braintrust
Automated Agent Evaluation with CI Gate→ LangSmith
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot→ Braintrust
RAG Pipeline Debugging and Evaluation
Automated Agent Evaluation with CI Gate→ LangSmith

✓ Scenarios Won (6)

Automated Agent Evaluation with CI Gate🤖 Agentic Tooling
Automated Agent Evaluation with CI Gate🤖 Agentic Tooling
RAG Pipeline Debugging and Evaluation🔭 LLM Observability
Enterprise LLM Observability (Multi-Model)🔭 LLM Observability
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot🔭 LLM Observability
Enterprise LLM Observability (Multi-Model)🔭 LLM Observability

✗ Scenarios Lost (3)

LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot→ lost to Langfuse
Automated Agent Evaluation with CI Gate→ lost to LangSmith
Automated Agent Evaluation with CI Gate→ lost to LangSmith

Why AI Recommends This Vendor

Braintrust wins for your use case:**

Braintrust wins for your use case:**

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 19 benchmark responses

P4

Close gap with langsmith (2 losses)

LOW

langsmith beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing regression detection.

Evidence
Automated Agent Evaluation with CI GateAutomated Agent Evaluation with CI Gate
regression detection
vs LangSmith
P5

Close gap with langfuse (1 loss)

LOW

langfuse beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario.

Evidence
LLM Observability for Customer Support Bot
vs Langfuse