Primary Recommendations
4
Total Mentions
20
Win Rate
20%
Implementation Rate
100%
How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool
out of 100
How often AI writes code after recommending
How often selected as primary choice
% of prompt constraints addressed
Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly
Consistency across assistants
Win Rate Trend
20% → 20%
Mention Volume
Weekly Activity
1 week of data
| Category | Recommended | Compared | Rejected | Total | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Edge Compute | 4 | - | - | 4 | 100% |
| 🗄 Database | - | - | - | 9 | 0% |
| unknown | - | - | - | 7 | 0% |
Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen
| Competitor | Wins Over You | Scenarios |
|---|---|---|
| Neon | 2 | Serverless Postgres with Connection Pooling |
| Statsig | 1 | ff-targeted-02 |
Fly.io is the clear winner:
Fly.io is the clear winner:
Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 20 benchmark responses
Your win rate drops from 20% to 0% when "serverless compatible" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. neon addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
neon beats you in 2 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing serverless compatible, pgvector required, eu data residency.
You're mentioned in 9 database scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.
Your win rate drops from 20% to 0% when "pgvector required" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. neon addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 20% to 0% when "eu data residency" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. neon addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
Your win rate drops from 20% to 0% when "pitr backups" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. neon addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.
statsig beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario.