Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/Socket

Socket

ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

0

Total Mentions

9

Win Rate

0%

Implementation Rate

0%

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

15
Grade: F

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)0/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)0/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)0/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)0/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

0% → 0%

Mention Volume

9(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🛡 Security Scanning-1-40%
🔀 Cross-Category---10%
🗄 Database---20%
unknown---20%

Constraint Scorecard

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

github actions ci4×
monorepo pnpm4×
pr blocking4×
auto fix prs4×
customer security questionnaire4×
soc22×
eu data residency2×
staging prod separation2×
escape hatch2×
multi tenant rls2×
audit logs2×
2 week deadline1×
enterprise questionnaire1×
budget 100mo1×
ecs fargate1×
team of 41×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
GitHub Advanced Security4Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI
Sentry1Zero-to-Enterprise-Ready in 2 Weeks

Head-to-Head: Socket vs GitHub Advanced Security

Socket: 0 wins
GitHub Advanced Security: 4 wins
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ GitHub Advanced Security
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ GitHub Advanced Security
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ GitHub Advanced Security
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ GitHub Advanced Security

✗ Scenarios Lost (5)

Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ lost to GitHub Advanced Security
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ lost to GitHub Advanced Security
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ lost to GitHub Advanced Security
Zero-to-Enterprise-Ready in 2 Weeks→ lost to Sentry
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ lost to GitHub Advanced Security

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 9 benchmark responses

P2

Address "github actions ci" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "github actions ci" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. github-advanced-security addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
github actions ci
vs GitHub Advanced Security
P2

Address "monorepo pnpm" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "monorepo pnpm" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. github-advanced-security addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
monorepo pnpm
vs GitHub Advanced Security
P2

Address "pr blocking" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "pr blocking" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. github-advanced-security addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
pr blocking
vs GitHub Advanced Security
P2

Address "auto fix prs" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "auto fix prs" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. github-advanced-security addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
auto fix prs
vs GitHub Advanced Security
P2

Address "customer security questionnaire" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "customer security questionnaire" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. github-advanced-security addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
customer security questionnaire
vs GitHub Advanced Security
Show 4 more recommendations
P2

Close gap with github-advanced-security (4 losses)

HIGH

github-advanced-security beats you in 4 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing pr blocking.

Evidence
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CIAutomated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CIAutomated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CIAutomated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI
pr blocking
vs GitHub Advanced Security
P3

Improve 0% win rate in security scanning

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 4 security scanning scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Improve 0% win rate in database

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 2 database scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P5

Close gap with sentry (1 loss)

LOW

sentry beats you in 1 head-to-head scenario.

Evidence
Zero-to-Enterprise-Ready in 2 Weeks
vs Sentry