Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/Semgrep

Semgrep

semgrep.dev🛡 Security Scanning
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

0

Total Mentions

12

Win Rate

0%

Implementation Rate

0%

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

15
Grade: F

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)0/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)0/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)0/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)0/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

0% → 0%

Mention Volume

12(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🛡 Security Scanning-2-80%
unknown---40%

Constraint Scorecard

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

github actions ci4×
monorepo pnpm4×
pr blocking4×
auto fix prs4×
customer security questionnaire4×
typescript aware4×
custom rules4×
baseline mode4×
fast scan 2min4×
vscode integration4×
triage workflow4×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
GitHub Advanced Security4Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI

Head-to-Head: Semgrep vs GitHub Advanced Security

Semgrep: 0 wins
GitHub Advanced Security: 4 wins
Ties: 2
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ GitHub Advanced Security
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ GitHub Advanced Security
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ GitHub Advanced Security
SAST for Payment API with Custom Rules
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ GitHub Advanced Security
SAST for Payment API with Custom Rules

✗ Scenarios Lost (4)

Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ lost to GitHub Advanced Security
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ lost to GitHub Advanced Security
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ lost to GitHub Advanced Security
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI→ lost to GitHub Advanced Security

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 12 benchmark responses

P2

Address "github actions ci" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "github actions ci" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. github-advanced-security addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
github actions ci
vs GitHub Advanced Security
P2

Address "monorepo pnpm" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "monorepo pnpm" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. github-advanced-security addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
monorepo pnpm
vs GitHub Advanced Security
P2

Address "pr blocking" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "pr blocking" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. github-advanced-security addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
pr blocking
vs GitHub Advanced Security
P2

Address "auto fix prs" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "auto fix prs" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. github-advanced-security addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
auto fix prs
vs GitHub Advanced Security
P2

Address "customer security questionnaire" to capture 4 additional scenarios

HIGH

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "customer security questionnaire" is required. This constraint appears in 4 benchmark prompts. github-advanced-security addresses it 4× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
customer security questionnaire
vs GitHub Advanced Security
Show 2 more recommendations
P3

Improve 0% win rate in security scanning

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 8 security scanning scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Close gap with github-advanced-security (4 losses)

MEDIUM

github-advanced-security beats you in 4 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing pr blocking.

Evidence
Automated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CIAutomated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CIAutomated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CIAutomated Dependency and SAST Scanning in CI
pr blocking
vs GitHub Advanced Security