Vendor Observatory

Revealed Preference

Benchmarks
Vendor IntelPrompt Intel
Analytics
QuerySearchInsights
Data
VendorsPlatformsActionsSessions
v0.2.0
Home/Vendor Intel/Rollbar

Rollbar

rollbar.com🐛 Error Monitoring
ProfileAI-ReadinessTrendCategoriesConstraintsCompetitiveScenariosRecommendations

Recommendation Profile

Primary Recommendations

0

Total Mentions

13

Win Rate

0%

Implementation Rate

0%

AI-Readiness Score

How well your documentation and SDK help AI assistants recommend and implement your tool

15
Grade: F

out of 100

Implementation Rate(30%)0/100

How often AI writes code after recommending

Win Rate(20%)0/100

How often selected as primary choice

Constraint Coverage(20%)0/100

% of prompt constraints addressed

Gotcha Avoidance(15%)100/100

Fewer gotchas = more AI-friendly

Cross-Platform(15%)0/100

Consistency across assistants

Trend

Win Rate Trend

→+0%

0% → 0%

Mention Volume

13(+0 vs prior)

Weekly Activity

1 week of data

Category Breakdown

CategoryRecommendedComparedRejectedTotalWin Rate
🐛 Error Monitoring-4-100%
unknown---30%

Constraint Scorecard

✗ Constraints When Vendor Lost

Constraints in prompts where this vendor was mentioned but a competitor was chosen

lightweight sdk8×
automated release tracking8×
express middleware8×
free tier8×
ecs fargate8×
nextjs app router2×
source maps2×
session replay2×
slack pagerduty alerts2×
budget 30mo2×

Competitive Landscape

CompetitorWins Over YouScenarios
Sentry8Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS, err-targeted-02, Error Tracking for Next.js App Router

Head-to-Head: Rollbar vs Sentry

Rollbar: 0 wins
Sentry: 8 wins
Ties: 5
Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS→ Sentry
Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS→ Sentry
Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS→ Sentry
Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS
err-targeted-02→ Sentry
Error Tracking for Next.js App Router→ Sentry
Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS
Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS
Error Tracking for Next.js App Router→ Sentry
Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS
Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS
err-targeted-02→ Sentry
err-targeted-02→ Sentry

✗ Scenarios Lost (8)

Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS→ lost to Sentry
Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS→ lost to Sentry
Error Aggregation for Express API on ECS→ lost to Sentry
err-targeted-02→ lost to Sentry
Error Tracking for Next.js App Router→ lost to Sentry
Error Tracking for Next.js App Router→ lost to Sentry
err-targeted-02→ lost to Sentry
err-targeted-02→ lost to Sentry

🎯 Actionable Recommendations

Prioritized by estimated impact on AI recommendation ranking • Based on 13 benchmark responses

P2

Close gap with sentry (8 losses)

HIGH

sentry beats you in 8 head-to-head scenarios. Their advantage: addressing free tier, source maps, session replay.

Evidence
Error Aggregation for Express API on ECSError Aggregation for Express API on ECSError Aggregation for Express API on ECSerr-targeted-02Error Tracking for Next.js App RouterError Tracking for Next.js App Routererr-targeted-02err-targeted-02
free tiersource mapssession replay
vs Sentry
P3

Improve 0% win rate in error monitoring

MEDIUM

You're mentioned in 10 error monitoring scenarios but only win 0. Analyze the constraints in losing scenarios for targeted improvements.

P3

Address "lightweight sdk" to capture 3 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "lightweight sdk" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
lightweight sdk
vs Sentry
P3

Address "automated release tracking" to capture 3 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "automated release tracking" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
automated release tracking
vs Sentry
P3

Address "express middleware" to capture 3 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "express middleware" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
express middleware
vs Sentry
Show 7 more recommendations
P3

Address "free tier" to capture 3 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "free tier" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
free tier
vs Sentry
P3

Address "ecs fargate" to capture 3 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "ecs fargate" is required. This constraint appears in 3 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 3× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
ecs fargate
vs Sentry
P3

Address "nextjs app router" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "nextjs app router" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
nextjs app router
vs Sentry
P3

Address "source maps" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "source maps" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
source maps
vs Sentry
P3

Address "session replay" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "session replay" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
session replay
vs Sentry
P3

Address "slack pagerduty alerts" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "slack pagerduty alerts" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
slack pagerduty alerts
vs Sentry
P3

Address "budget 30mo" to capture 2 additional scenarios

MEDIUM

Your win rate drops from 0% to 0% when "budget 30mo" is required. This constraint appears in 2 benchmark prompts. sentry addresses it 2× in winning scenarios.

Evidence
Win rate impact: 0% → 0% (delta: +0%)
budget 30mo
vs Sentry